Social Networking And Its Impact On Society - 1327 Words

In today s world, the culture depends on they behaviors of humans. The Communities these days have become closer to each other â€Å"openness to experiencing and thinking about things from other points of view† (Zion and Kozleski, 2005, p.17) because the people from different cultures have openness of the whole worlds and they have idea about diverse cultures regardless the identity of the person his origin or religion. Culture had become the identity of our communities through our behaviors. It has many factors contribute to the formation of each individual’s cultural . Social networking between people contributed to the development of the individual culture and in the development of society. Own personal culture According†¦show more content†¦In the last week, we talked in class on the topic of cultures, and the subject was very exciting for me. We also brought a traditional dish, and three items to talk about it with the group. I prepared a sweet coffee with almond. This coffee is famous in the western region. We make in the first Islamic New Year. I was happy because it won the admiration of my classmates. I brought with me Oud Wood which is a distinct and beautiful smell. We use it to perfume the house as well as clothing. I also brought bracelets, it was a gift from my girlfriend when she traveled to Turkey. Finally, I brought a picture which includes me and my son when we went to Florida last year. The partner`s culture It is interesting to identify the variety and different cultures, because it enriches our knowledge of the world around us, and makes us feel that we evolve. With my group we had established a discussion about culture, and I did not find many differences between me and the group members. We first described our family, how we keep contact with family members, hobbies and communication styles. I learned about contact with family, about some of the habits that still affect our lives. Also I talked about the activities that practice them. Maha and Majida have the most habits in common with me about lifestyle and way of dealing with the elderly. In our family, we care about them

Write a critical analysis of the story Rosena on the Mountain Free Essay Example, 2500 words

How Can Something So Wrong Feel So Right All Along? A Critical Analysis of Rene Depestre’s â€Å"Rosena on the Mountain† Rene Depestre’s short story â€Å"Rosena on the Mountain† is one of a kind. A lack of knowledge about the culture and background of the author and the Haitian people could affect one’s interpretation of the story. For a moralist, it could be considered very sensual and unfit for general readership. However, a deeper understanding of the background of the people and the author could lead to a greater appreciation of this piece of work which makes it unique and worth reading. Personally, reading â€Å"Rosena on the Mountain† enhanced and enriched my experience ad understanding of the Haitian culture and human nature. Alain is a round character, a true-to-life figure that faces real life struggles. He is at the same time dynamic in the sense that the character has evolved into a more aggressive and mature individual. Rosena, on the other hand, can be considered a round character because of her convincing personality that is consistent throughout the story. Father James Mulligan may be considered a flat character because he is a stereotype of orthodox priests who assume an appearance of holiness and are prejudiced though they are also humans and are tempted to yield to what they consider evil – sex. If Alain is the protagonist, then the antagonists could either be the priest or Rosena, since he is torn between the two. We will write a custom essay sample on Write a critical analysis of the story 'Rosena on the Mountain' or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now One is pulling him to the religious/Roman Catholic priesthood, and the other towards sensual freedom and back to pagan practices. The use of the first person point of view is effective in showing the inner conflict of the main character. The reader can easily empathise with the struggles Alain went through and share with his struggles and triumphs. Symbolism is also present in the story. Mountain may be redundant because Haiti is actually an Indian term for mountains (â€Å"Haiti†. Infoplease). Rosena is a Haitian and in the title she is on the mountain. The term could have several meanings, like a literal mountain, an obstacle, a challenge, something remote or insurmountable. The name Rosena from the word rose could stand for a flower, beautiful but thorny, desirable and challenging. Moreover, irony is evident in the whole story. Alain’s pursuit for holiness is not achieved in the priestly vocation but in acknowledging his own self w ith all his physical and psychological longings. The priest, on the other hand, projects an image of holiness but in reality a weak person of sensual desires too.

U.s. Entered War On The United States - 1724 Words

9-11-01, September 11, 2001, a typical day for the United States and citizens of New York City, which soon changed and will be forever remembered as the beginning of a new America. October 7, 2001, when the U.S. entered war in the Middle East in response to the attacks that happened on September 11th. The attacks on the U.S. were not only the start to the longest war in American history, but also the start of many changes for our country. Some effects on the states include political changes and new improvements. Ideas to improve our safety included involved security improvements, new laws and agencies. Although the political effects after 9/11 were the majority of our concerns, the economic aftermath and recovery were huge. The U.S. going†¦show more content†¦With a great nation comes great political power and responsibility played in the upkeep of our states. After the events of 9/11 America’s political side was forever altered. Clearly upset with the Middle East and whom the U.S. believed was responsible foreign affairs had to be looked at. Our government had put a stop to all communication, trade, travel, and influence from some countries overseas. Our President and congress were immediately forced to stop all meetings with foreign leaders due to the security regulations of our Department of Defense. Not only was our government no longer involved with the majority of other countries our citizens also could not travel to these places nor buy from them and all who were believed to be involved in secret affiliation would be brought to court. Policy with other countries prior to the events was different when looking at the topic of involvement of the U.S. and others. Before 9/11, the Bush administration had focused its foreign policy attention on China and Russia; on determining whether a Middle East peace settlement was in the cards; on building a ballistic missile defense system; and on contemplating how to deal with rogue states such as Iran, Iraq, Libya, and North Korea. At many meetings of the National Security Council, officials debated the pros and cons of a new sanctions regime against Saddam Hussein s dictatorial government in Baghdad; they also discussed what would be done if U.S. planes enforcing the no-fly

Essay On Jefferson Essay Example For Students

Essay On Jefferson Essay Jefferson had destroyed political traditions. From his contradictions and defecting his priciples, Jefferson destroyed the political precedent and is a exemplatory hypocrite, which can be seen throughout his administration. Jefferson was an admired statesman who was grappling unsuccessfully with the moral issue of slavery. Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, opposed slavery his whole life, yet he never freed his own slaves. He championed Enlightenment principles, yet never freed himself of the prejudices of his soceity. Jefferson was extremely hypocritical in the issue of slavery. Jefferson was a plantation owner early in his life, and had slaves working for him throughout his life. Jefferson had tolerated while he didnt accept others who owned slaves. Jefferson denounced the slave owners, while he was owning and using slaves. Although Jefferson was supposedly a good slave owner, his hypocritical nature made him accuse others not to own slaves while he, himself was owning slaves. Another part of the hypocrisy was that Jefferson believed that the slaves were dependent upon the white man, while he, himself was dependent upon the slaves. Jefferson also was hypocritcal in his ac quisition of the Loisiana territory. In Jeffersonian principles, large expansive governments were bad, and small was good. This was a antithesis of that principle. Jefferson knew that the acquisition of the Loisiana territory was beneficial to the welfare of the U.S. According to the constitution, nowhere in the constitution is the acquisition of land a right of the government, Jeffersons predisposition was to strictly go by the constitution (as seen with the national bank controversy), this is another contradiction during his administration. Since the appropriation of the Lousiana territory was important for the expansion of the united states, he temporarily dismissed his principles, therefore destroying political traditions. Another hypocritical event during Jeffersons administration was his acceptance of the National Bank. Early in Jeffersons political career, Jefferson had debated with Hamilton on whether to have the National Bank. When this government was first established, it was possible to have kept it going on true principles, but the contracted, English, half-lettured ideas of Hamilton destroyed that hope in the bud, We can pay off his debts in 15 years. Early in Jeffersons Administration, Jefferson had denounced the National Bank. At the end of his administration, Jefferson realized that the National Bank was important and this is hypocritical by disregarding his principles. The Burr conspiracy depicted Jefferson as a ruthless, and a individual who will do anything inorder to achieve his goal. Jefferson championed civil liberties and unalienable rights. Yet, Jefferson violated civil liberties by coercing witnesses, arrested with out habeus corpus and prosecuting in a court of his own. Jefferson and Jeffersonians are hypocrites from the start and they destroyed political tradition as seen during Jeffersons administration. Jeffersonians show an immense amount of hypocritism in their policies. For example, Federalists had supported high tarriffs, inorder to protect national manufacturers and american industry. The tarriffs were a vital determinent, which kept the economy of the United States viable. The Jeffersonians, not the Federalists began the American system of protecting american industry which initially was a major constituent of the federalist platform.